• Home
  • The Work
    • The Heads
    • The Figure >
      • The Lena Series
    • Studio Paintings
    • Figure Drawings
    • Plein Air Paintings
  • Contact
  • Blog
George Rhys Artist

Genre Attractors and Detractors

1/29/2019

0 Comments

 
PictureThree Graces, oil, 1967, 38 x 24, The last one I still have. Terrible photo, sorry.
Every genre has its specific attraction for the artist, and certainly for me. Each also has had its detractors.
 
As a young man I painted many still lifes, frequently on a very dark ground. During those years my approach evolved continuously. Composition and the harmony of muted colors were my primary interest. I endured a good amount of ignorant criticism for my still lifes, but not for the qualities that were important to me. “Why would I buy this?” one wag questioned. “Who’s hungry?” Another friend whom I respected very highly chose to make no comment about one of the still lifes but to laugh derisively--on more than one occasion. He was an accomplished artist and I would have considered any of his suggestions seriously, but I had no way of knowing if he even saw what I had been trying to do.
 
All but two of those still lifes sold, but there were too few of them, too modestly priced, to significantly augment my income.

PictureScanned from the only vestige I have left, a dirty slide. Oil. Maybe 1970. Maybe 38 x 24.
Inspired (or scolded!) by the Impressionists I began painting on a conventional white ground, but that was the only technique of theirs I emulated. The muted colors gave way to bright pure hue, though never straight from the tube. My most common subject was the human figure, with and without clothing, rendered in a style which a friend criticized as resembling a coloring book, with flat areas of color outlined by darkened umber. I worked very hard on shape, composition and how to make those big areas of saturated hue work together. I still have a couple of those kicking around the studio. 

​
In 1974 I moved to the middle of nowhere in the high desert of Southern California, surrounded by mountains and huge rock formations. Naturally I focused on landscape, returned to my beloved muted colors, and continued to investigate composition and shape. Now bright colors were in fashion and I was told that my carefully balanced tonal compositions were “not colorful.” Isolated as I was, I sold very few of these; but also refused several offers.

PictureMile Marker 1812. Oil, 38 x 48 or so, 1977 or so. If I had it to do again I would compose this differently. Oddly, it was very popular.
Then I taught mathematics for twenty-five years.
 
And now I am in south Texas in my eighth year of retirement. 

​
For years my dream had been to travel around the country and paint landscapes. Toward that end I converted from oil to acrylic so that I would not have to worry about a car-full of wet paintings. The conversion has been a challenge which I have enjoyed. Any dissatisfaction I have experienced with those acrylic paintings has been over bad composition and not anything that would have been ameliorated by a return to oils, so when a friend tells me I would be a better painter if I did go back to oils, I know better. Oils are easier for me, and perhaps there are aspects of my work that would be more attractive to some, but I can do pretty much whatever I want with the acrylics. If those paintings fall short, it is due to my limitations, not the medium.

 
In the last two years I have been producing reams of drawings and a couple dozen paintings of the nude figure, and posting them on Instagram and Facebook.* A couple of friends have made “humorous” (but not to me) remarks and I notice that I don’t see many nudes on Facebook, at least not on my feed. So no more nudes on my “family” page. And that’s okay.
 
For every period of my art “career”— (I should be so lucky as to have had a career) —there have been comments, criticisms, and even kudos that completely fail to address what I am legitimately striving for. That can be painful, irritating, even amusing. But it hasn’t stopped me.
 
*You can find them on Instagram @georgerhysusa or at the George Rhys Artist page on Facebook. Some day many will even be visible here on this webpage.
​​

0 Comments

Crickets

1/17/2019

2 Comments

 
Picture
Have I killed my georgerhysartist Facebook page?

I have let both of my Facebook pages and my blog at www.georgerhysart.com/blog1 lie fallow for far too long, for real but irrelevant reasons.

Now, after several decades of neglect, I have resurrected my dedication to figure work and rediscovered the strength of my artistic motivation. I have also discovered a community of like-minded artists on Instagram. For a while I shared my Instagram posts on Facebook as I had been doing with my landscapes. But this is America, not Europe, and I became aware that my frequent posting of my figure work was out of place on my home page. Okay. So I decided to post it on my georgerhysartist page. Crickets, on a page that had once had a satisfactory following.

I confess that by going dormant it is entirely my own fault, but I am not sure what is not working. Maybe it really is because I am posting nudes, which seem to have their best following in other countries. Maybe it is because everyone has moved on. Maybe it is because my work is just not good enough—whatever that means—or in any event, not attractive to my friends.

Picture
I will confess to disappointment, but, more than that, confusion. You see, I find it very difficult to post to Facebook. There are so many things I would rather be doing, like loading the dishwasher or mowing the lawn—let alone making more art—so I don’t get around to posting. For some reason I have the conviction that I should be posting about my art more regularly, and if that is wrong then I will happily release myself from the obligation.

Here is what I propose to do. I will overcome my resistance to posting and keep up the georgerhysartist page regardless of the silent response. For a while.

As for the blog (georgerhysart.com/blog1), I have heard that folks are not getting notifications of new posts. That is because I am not sharing it with my Facebook homepage any more. I will look into sending out email notifications. Meantime you can assist this confused and irresponsible artist/writer by letting me know if you are interested in anything I might put up on Facebook. I will continue with Instagram and my blog: Instagram because I do get responses, and the blog because it is a good way to make myself finish the 50 or so first drafts that I have piled up.

In any event I would love to hear from you one way or another, even if it’s just to say, “Oh hi, George! I thought you were dead!” ​

2 Comments

What I Want to do in a Painting

1/12/2019

1 Comment

 
PictureIsland in the Stream, Acrylic, Private collection
I would rather one person comprehend what I am trying to accomplish in a work of art than to have hundreds swoon over some surface property. Don't get me wrong; if they swoon, I will be happy. I am only saying that I am still happier to find a person who enjoys what I enjoy about my work.

To be honest, my work is not that special—though certainly it is to me. I would like you, dear reader, to understand what it is about my own painting that you might find special.

To begin, here are some things that are not my objectives. I thought to begin that sentence by saying, “Here are things that my paintings are not,” but often a painting will display one of those unintended qualities, probably springing from my unconscious, or barely conscious, in spite of my intentions.
​
My paintings do not aspire to beauty, or even prettiness. They are not crowd pleasers. They do not mean to say:

Look what I can do!
Here is something pretty I found.
Here is a nice-looking rectangle to look at.
This is what the world is really like.
This is how I am feeling right now.
This is what a dream looks like.
Herein lies a tale
​

PictureDry Stream Bed, researched for Maren. Acrylic, 24 x 18
You might well ask, “So, then, just what is the point?” Perhaps for you one or more of those goals is exactly what you look for in a piece of art. Perhaps you will find one or more of those statements to apply to my work; but if you do, I don’t deserve full credit for it.

​I want connection. On CBS Sunday Morning Willem Dafoe explained what thrilled him about a Van Gogh painting, in an interview about his role as Vincent in the movie At Eternity’s Gate. He moved his hands to show how he followed the artist’s motions in creating the painting and I was electrified to see someone else express that way of getting into a painting. That is the form of connection for which I strive.
​
A big piece of my pleasure in perusing art is kinesthetic. Something in me responds to the perceived actions of the artist. This may occur at a different level—not higher necessarily, just different--from that at which many viewers enjoy responding to art. My response is not that profound, nor beyond the reach of any attentive observer.

Kinesthetic response was a big piece of abstract expressionism; in work like mine it comes with an image, and this perceptual tension between identifying an image and recognizing the kinesthetics behind its production excites the brain and makes for an engaging experience.

PictureBlackwater Reflections on the Suwannee, acrylic, 20 x 16
The Twentieth Century saw a great deal of very physical painting of images, but most of what comes to mind is expressionism. I am not an expressionist. If I am exhibiting anything affective, it is the joy of watching my actions produce a set of streaks that my brain can cobble together into a recognizable image. And the connection I seek is through that experience.

Sometimes work like mine is mistakenly identified as impressionism. I say mistakenly because the impressionists created images by matching, daub for daub, the color and location on the canvas with the color and location of a patch of color in the world. They were exploring the world of light and color, and beautifully, but their interest was not to give the brain a modicum of detail and set it to work decoding chicken scratches into meaningful pictures. A minor point, I admit, especially since I might use impressionistic techniques now and again. It is the intention that is different.
​
I am not the only one painting like this. I cannot say how many of those doing similar work are deliberately teasing the brain for the same reason, but I hope I have done a good enough job of describing what I am doing to allow you to enjoy my work and also to find similar pleasures elsewhere.

Again, I make no claim to specialness. For what it’s worth, the only claim I can make is that no one else can be me and do this work. They have to be who they are.

1 Comment

    Verbiage

    Sometimes you just have to talk about ideas. Well, I do anyway.

    Archives

    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly